↓ Skip to main content

Infants prefer the faces of strangers or mothers to morphed faces: an uncanny valley between social novelty and familiarity

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infants prefer the faces of strangers or mothers to morphed faces: an uncanny valley between social novelty and familiarity
Published in
Biology Letters, June 2012
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshi-Taka Matsuda, Yoko Okamoto, Misako Ida, Kazuo Okanoya, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi

Abstract

The 'uncanny valley' response is a phenomenon involving the elicitation of a negative feeling and subsequent avoidant behaviour in human adults and infants as a result of viewing very realistic human-like robots or computer avatars. It is hypothesized that this uncanny feeling occurs because the realistic synthetic characters elicit the concept of 'human' but fail to satisfy it. Such violations of our normal expectations regarding social signals generate a feeling of unease. This conflict-induced uncanny valley between mutually exclusive categories (human and synthetic agent) raises a new question: could an uncanny feeling be elicited by other mutually exclusive categories, such as familiarity and novelty? Given that infants prefer both familiarity and novelty in social objects, we address this question as well as the associated developmental profile. Using the morphing technique and a preferential-looking paradigm, we demonstrated uncanny valley responses of infants to faces of mothers (i.e. familiarity) and strangers (i.e. novelty). Furthermore, this effect strengthened with the infant's age. We excluded the possibility that infants detect and avoid traces of morphing. This conclusion follows from our finding that the infants equally preferred strangers' faces and the morphed faces of two strangers. These results indicate that an uncanny valley between familiarity and novelty may accentuate the categorical perception of familiar and novel objects.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 3 2%
Japan 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Computer Science 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,178,237
of 26,738,782 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#1,551
of 3,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,486
of 183,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,738,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.