↓ Skip to main content

「セクハラ」をめぐる言説を再考する:ことばの歪みの源泉をたどる

Overview of attention for article published in Kotoba, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「セクハラ」をめぐる言説を再考する:ことばの歪みの源泉をたどる
Published in
Kotoba, December 2018
DOI 10.20741/kotoba.39.0_17
Authors

佐々木 恵理

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,651,124
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Kotoba
#2
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,820
of 450,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kotoba
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them