↓ Skip to main content

[書評] メタ倫理学に入門するために 佐藤岳詩著『メタ倫理学入門 道徳のそもそもを考える』

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[書評] メタ倫理学に入門するために 佐藤岳詩著『メタ倫理学入門 道徳のそもそもを考える』
Published in
Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan, April 2020
DOI 10.34326/pawj.26.0_95
Authors

林 誓雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,249,313
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan
#3
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,181
of 402,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them