You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-439 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Catherine Walpole, David Prieto-Merino, Phil Edwards, John Cleland, Gretchen Stevens, Ian Roberts |
| Abstract |
The energy requirement of species at each trophic level in an ecological pyramid is a function of the number of organisms and their average mass. Regarding human populations, although considerable attention is given to estimating the number of people, much less is given to estimating average mass, despite evidence that average body mass is increasing. We estimate global human biomass, its distribution by region and the proportion of biomass due to overweight and obesity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 425 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 7% |
| Australia | 28 | 7% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| India | 11 | 3% |
| Japan | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Sweden | 6 | 1% |
| France | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 45 | 11% |
| Unknown | 199 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 340 | 80% |
| Scientists | 48 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,074 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Egypt | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1048 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 210 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 154 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 14% |
| Researcher | 112 | 10% |
| Other | 52 | 5% |
| Other | 138 | 13% |
| Unknown | 260 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 186 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 249 | 23% |
| Unknown | 299 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2024.
All research outputs
#13,322
of 26,264,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8
of 18,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31
of 179,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,264,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.