↓ Skip to main content

天測誤差の考察(日本航海学会第41回講演会)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Nautical Society of Japan, January 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
天測誤差の考察(日本航海学会第41回講演会)
Published in
The Journal of the Nautical Society of Japan, January 1969
DOI 10.9749/jina.42.0_109
Authors

嶋田 和治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#17,923,911
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Nautical Society of Japan
#5
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,328
of 13,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Nautical Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them