The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aeolian dust in Colorado Plateau soils: Nutrient inputs and recent change in source
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.121094298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Reynolds, Jayne Belnap, Marith Reheis, Paul Lamothe, Fred Luiszer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 21% |
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 11% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 52 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,634,351
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#62,782
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,646
of 43,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#240
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.