↓ Skip to main content

表在エコー図検査と心エコー図検査のコラボレーションにより感染性心内膜炎が迅速に診断できた僧帽弁逸脱症の1例:Staphylococcus warneriによる自己弁への感染性心内膜炎

Overview of attention for article published in Choonpa Igaku, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
表在エコー図検査と心エコー図検査のコラボレーションにより感染性心内膜炎が迅速に診断できた僧帽弁逸脱症の1例:Staphylococcus warneriによる自己弁への感染性心内膜炎
Published in
Choonpa Igaku, July 2016
DOI 10.3179/jjmu.jjmu.a.63
Authors

山田 博胤, 田中 秀和, 宮原 俊介, 尾形 竜郎, 楠瀬 賢也, 西尾 進, 鳥居 裕太, 平田 有紀奈, 大北 裕, 佐田 政隆

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Choonpa Igaku
#8
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,978
of 379,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Choonpa Igaku
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them