The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On-demand transfer of trapped photons on a chip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.1501690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryotaro Konoike, Haruyuki Nakagawa, Masahiro Nakadai, Takashi Asano, Yoshinori Tanaka, Susumu Noda |
| Abstract |
Photonic crystal nanocavities, which have modal volumes of the order of a cubic wavelength in the material, are of great interest as flexible platforms for manipulating photons. Recent developments in ultra-high quality factor nanocavities with long photon lifetimes have encouraged us to develop an ultra-compact and flexible photon manipulation technology where photons are trapped in networks of such nanocavities. The most fundamental requirement is the on-demand transfer of photons to and from the trapped states of arbitrary nanocavities. We experimentally demonstrate photon transfer between two nearly resonant nanocavities at arbitrary positions on a chip, triggered by the irradiation of a third nonresonant nanocavity using an optical control pulse. We obtain a high transfer efficiency of ~90% with a photon lifetime of ~200 ps. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 28% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 32 | 48% |
| Engineering | 19 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,927,892
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#7,229
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,385
of 348,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#98
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.