↓ Skip to main content

Pathological mechanism of secondary-progressive multiples sclerosis and its animal model

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathological mechanism of secondary-progressive multiples sclerosis and its animal model
Published in
Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.2177/jsci.39.103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinji OKI

Abstract

  Development of acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) depends on Th17 cells expressing the nuclear factor NR4A2, which we have previously reported to be upregulated in peripheral blood T cells from patients of multiple sclerosis (MS). EAE induced in mice lacking NR4A2 in T cells showed a great reduction in Th17-mediated acute symptoms, whereas a late-onset disease independent of NR4A2 was still inducible. We identified cytotoxic T-cell-like CD4+ T cells expressing the T-box transcription factor Eomesodermin (Eomes) as a pathogenic component for the development of the late-onset disease. Furthermore, T cell-specific deletion of the Eomes gene or Eomes-specific RNA interference in vivo remarkably ameliorated the late-onset EAE. Intriguingly, similar Eomes-expressing CD4+ T cells are increased in the peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid only from patients with secondary-progressive MS accompanied by neurodegenerative symptoms, but not in relapsing-remitting MS. Mechanistic analysis revealed that granzyme B was secreted by Eomes-expressing CD4+ T cells and the activation of protease-activated receptor-1 by granzyme B is involved in the neuroinflammation observed in the late-onset EAE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Lecturer 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,436,495
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology
#62
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,851
of 402,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.