↓ Skip to main content

A Criticism to Regional History Books and School Text Books on the Legend of Movement against Railway Construction during Meiji Era

Overview of attention for article published in THE NEW GEOGRAPHY, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Criticism to Regional History Books and School Text Books on the Legend of Movement against Railway Construction during Meiji Era
Published in
THE NEW GEOGRAPHY, January 2006
DOI 10.5996/newgeo.54.1
Authors

AOKI Eiichi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,839,006
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from THE NEW GEOGRAPHY
#40
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,885
of 175,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE NEW GEOGRAPHY
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.