↓ Skip to main content

漢方文献の善本を所蔵する図書館とその利用法

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Library Bulletin, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
漢方文献の善本を所蔵する図書館とその利用法
Published in
Pharmaceutical Library Bulletin, September 2011
DOI 10.11291/jpla1956.27.25
Authors

小曽戸 洋, 原中 瑠璃子, 小林 茂三郎

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Library Bulletin
#5
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,694
of 143,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Library Bulletin
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.