↓ Skip to main content

Serum Vitamin B12 Levels in Young Vegans Who Eat Brown Rice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum Vitamin B12 Levels in Young Vegans Who Eat Brown Rice
Published in
Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology, January 1995
DOI 10.3177/jnsv.41.587
Pubmed ID
Authors

H Suzuki

Abstract

A nutritional analysis was conducted on the dietary intake of a group of 6 vegan children aged 7 to 14 who had been living on a vegan diet including brown rice for from 4 to 10 years, and on that of an age-matched control group. In addition, their serum vitamin B12 levels and other data (red blood cell count, hematocrit, hemoglobin, etc.) were determined in the laboratory. In vegans' diets, 2-4 g of nori (dried laver), which contained B12, were consumed daily. Not a single case of symptoms due to B12 deficiency was found. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to any of the examination data, including B12 levels (p < 0.05). Therefore, consumption of nori may keep vegans from suffering B12 deficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,251,721
of 26,525,642 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology
#51
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#657
of 77,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.