The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Origins of C4 Grasslands: Integrating Evolutionary and Ecosystem Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1177216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika J. Edwards, Colin P. Osborne, Caroline A. E. Strömberg, Stephen A. Smith, C4 Grasses Consortium, William J. Bond, Pascal-Antoine Christin, Asaph B. Cousins, Melvin R. Duvall, David L. Fox, Robert P. Freckleton, Oula Ghannoum, James Hartwell, Yongsong Huang, Christine M. Janis, Jon E. Keeley, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Alan K. Knapp, Andrew D. B. Leakey, David M. Nelson, Jeffery M. Saarela, Rowan F. Sage, Osvaldo E. Sala, Nicolas Salamin, Christopher J. Still, Brett Tipple |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 3% |
| Brazil | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Argentina | 6 | <1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1141 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 281 | 22% |
| Researcher | 229 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 144 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 121 | 10% |
| Professor | 71 | 6% |
| Other | 242 | 19% |
| Unknown | 162 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 571 | 46% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 204 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 154 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 65 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | <1% |
| Other | 47 | 4% |
| Unknown | 199 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,466,525
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#43,011
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,671
of 106,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#233
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.