↓ Skip to main content

中学1年生女子における鉄欠乏のリスク因子の検討

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
中学1年生女子における鉄欠乏のリスク因子の検討
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, May 2020
DOI 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.78.57
Authors

大野 公子, 野澤 美樹, 伊藤 早苗, 佐藤 理恵子, 石田 裕美, 上西 一弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,065,446
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#117
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,104
of 431,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.