The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immigration does not offset harvest mortality in groups of a cooperatively breeding carnivore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acv.12593 |
| Authors |
S. B. Bassing, D. E. Ausband, M. S. Mitchell, M. K. Schwartz, J. J. Nowak, G. C. Hale, L. P. Waits |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#943,558
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#125
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,566
of 434,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.