↓ Skip to main content

崑崙奴考 : 日本民族学会第6回研究大会報告要旨 その2

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ethnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 174)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
崑崙奴考 : 日本民族学会第6回研究大会報告要旨 その2
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ethnology, March 2018
DOI 10.14890/minkennewseries.32.3_211
Authors

小川 博

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,032,488
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#14
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,717
of 345,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#13
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.