↓ Skip to main content

アカモンガニの紋の数

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer (0008543X), July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アカモンガニの紋の数
Published in
Cancer (0008543X), July 2017
DOI 10.18988/cancer.14.0_9
Authors

藤田 喜久, 野甫 斉, 諸喜田 茂充

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#12,508
of 14,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,182
of 328,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#135
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.