↓ Skip to main content

旧ソ連領被抑留者における「収容所の親鸞」

Overview of attention for article published in Gendai to Shinran, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
旧ソ連領被抑留者における「収容所の親鸞」
Published in
Gendai to Shinran, June 2020
DOI 10.24694/shinran.42.0_2
Authors

東 真行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,879,262
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Gendai to Shinran
#2
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,779
of 434,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gendai to Shinran
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them