↓ Skip to main content

知的障害のある人のディスアビリティ経験と自己評価 : 6人の知的障害のある女性の人生の語りから

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Social Welfare, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 104)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
知的障害のある人のディスアビリティ経験と自己評価 : 6人の知的障害のある女性の人生の語りから
Published in
Japanese Journal of Social Welfare, July 2018
DOI 10.24469/jssw.52.2_54
Authors

杉田 穏子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,094,202
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Social Welfare
#34
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,380
of 341,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Social Welfare
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.