↓ Skip to main content

骨格筋疾患(筋障害)としてのサルコペニアの定義と診断

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
骨格筋疾患(筋障害)としてのサルコペニアの定義と診断
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.2490/jjrmc.57.439
Authors

吉村 芳弘, 田中 智香, 齊藤 智子

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,407,338
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#71
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,693
of 435,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them