The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remotely sensed thermal decay rate: an index for vegetation monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-66193-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. S. Kumar, L. Prihodko, B. M. Lind, J. Anchang, W. Ji, C. W. Ross, M. N. Kahiu, N. M. Velpuri, N. P. Hanan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,687,480
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#45,042
of 136,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,074
of 404,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,496
of 3,878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.