↓ Skip to main content

ベンゾジアゼピン受容体作動薬初回使用の実態―継続使用との対比

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ベンゾジアゼピン受容体作動薬初回使用の実態―継続使用との対比
Published in
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, June 2020
DOI 10.11256/jjdi.22.35
Authors

馬場 香菜子, 小原 依里, 飯原 なおみ

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,728,069
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#29
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,701
of 435,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them