↓ Skip to main content

話者の意図と聞き手の理解:語彙アクセントの隠れた作用

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
話者の意図と聞き手の理解:語彙アクセントの隠れた作用
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, November 2008
DOI 10.11225/jcss.13.428
Authors

広瀬 友紀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#16,128,513
of 26,266,075 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#173
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,852
of 102,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#19
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.