The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wave-like Patterns of Plant Phenology Determine Ungulate Movement Tactics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen O Aikens, Atle Mysterud, Jerod A Merkle, Francesca Cagnacci, Inger Maren Rivrud, Mark Hebblewhite, Mark A Hurley, Wibke Peters, Scott Bergen, Johannes De Groeve, Samantha P H Dwinnell, Benedikt Gehr, Marco Heurich, A J Mark Hewison, Anders Jarnemo, Petter Kjellander, Max Kröschel, Alain Licoppe, John D C Linnell, Evelyn H Merrill, Arthur D Middleton, Nicolas Morellet, Lalenia Neufeld, Anna C Ortega, Katherine L Parker, Luca Pedrotti, Kelly M Proffitt, Sonia Saïd, Hall Sawyer, Brandon M Scurlock, Johannes Signer, Patrick Stent, Pavel Šustr, Tara Szkorupa, Kevin L Monteith, Matthew J Kauffman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Iceland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#727,384
of 26,518,120 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,447
of 15,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,294
of 436,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#78
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,518,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.