You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
動物の自然発症腫瘍に対する半導体レーザーとインドシアニングリーン修飾リポソーム(ICG-lipo)を用いた光線力学的療法の治療成績
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2530/jslsm.jslsm-40_0045 |
| Authors |
Yoshiharu Okamoto, Masamichi Yamashita, Tomohiro Osaki, Kazuo Azuma, Norihiko Ito, Yusuke Murahata, Takeshi Tsuka, Tomohiro Imagawa, Akiko Suganami, Yutaka Tamura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine
#78
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,352
of 481,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.