You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ナローバンド UVB を発光する LED を用いたアレルギー性鼻炎の光治療装置の開発
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3950/jibiinkoka.123.455 |
| Authors |
武田 憲昭 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#143
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,142
of 433,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.