↓ Skip to main content

Japanese Heart Failure Society 2018 Scientific Statement on Nutritional Assessment and Management in Heart Failure Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Japanese Heart Failure Society 2018 Scientific Statement on Nutritional Assessment and Management in Heart Failure Patients
Published in
Circulation Journal, July 2020
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Yoshiharu Kinugasa, Yuki Iida, Kentaro Kamiya, Yasuki Kihara, Yuji Kono, Yukihito Sato, Norio Suzuki, Harumi Takeuchi, Taiki Higo, Yasushi Miyazawa, Isao Miyajima, Akira Yamashina, Katsushi Yoshita, Koichi Washida, Masafumi Kuzuya, Tetsuya Takahashi, Yutaka Nakaya, Naoyuki Hasebe, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Consensus Writing Committee on behalf of The Japanese Heart Failure Society

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 41 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 47 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,288,653
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,110
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,851
of 430,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.