↓ Skip to main content

Expanding tropical forest monitoring into Dry Forests: The DRYFLOR protocol for permanent plots

Overview of attention for article published in PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
101 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding tropical forest monitoring into Dry Forests: The DRYFLOR protocol for permanent plots
Published in
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/ppp3.10112
Authors

Peter W. Moonlight, Karina Banda‐R, Oliver L. Phillips, Kyle G. Dexter, R. Toby Pennington, Tim R. Baker, Haroldo C. de Lima, Laurie Fajardo, Roy González‐M., Reynaldo Linares‐Palomino, Jon Lloyd, Marcelo Nascimento, Darién Prado, Catalina Quintana, Ricarda Riina, Gina M. Rodríguez M., Dora Maria Villela, Ana Carla M. M. Aquino, Luzmila Arroyo, Cidney Bezerra, Alexandre Tadeu Brunello, Roel J. W. Brienen, Domingos Cardoso, Kuo‐Jung Chao, Ítalo Antônio Cotta Coutinho, John Cunha, Tomas Domingues, Mário Marcos do Espírito Santo, Ted R. Feldpausch, Moabe Ferreira Fernandes, Zoë A. Goodwin, Eliana María Jiménez, Aurora Levesley, Leonel Lopez‐Toledo, Beatriz Marimon, Raquel C. Miatto, Marcelo Mizushima, Abel Monteagudo, Magna Soelma Beserra de Moura, Alejandro Murakami, Danilo Neves, Renata Nicora Chequín, Tony César de Sousa Oliveira, Edmar Almeida de Oliveira, Luciano P. de Queiroz, Alan Pilon, Desirée Marques Ramos, Carlos Reynel, Priscyla M. S. Rodrigues, Rubens Santos, Tiina Särkinen, Valdemir Fernando da Silva, Rodolfo M. S. Souza, Rodolfo Vasquez, Elmar Veenendaal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 34 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 33%
Environmental Science 25 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#658,064
of 26,439,667 outputs
Outputs from PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
#69
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,296
of 434,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,439,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.