↓ Skip to main content

雑誌『太陽』による風景写真の流通が風景の見かたにもたらした影響

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 174)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
雑誌『太陽』による風景写真の流通が風景の見かたにもたらした影響
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2017
DOI 10.5632/jila.80.405
Authors

水谷 知生

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,063,242
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#16
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,369
of 430,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.