↓ Skip to main content

八木誠政博士をいたむ

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1967
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
八木誠政博士をいたむ
Published in
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1967
DOI 10.1303/jjaez.1967.32
Authors

小泉 清明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,379,730
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#108
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,514
of 11,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them