The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Safety and Effect of Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit According to Cancellation Criteria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.2490/prm.20200016 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tomoko Sakai, Chisato Hoshino, Atsushi Okawa, Kenji Wakabayashi, Hidenobu Shigemitsu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,693,827
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine
#41
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,856
of 427,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.