↓ Skip to main content

Open‐ocean boundary conditions from interior data: Local and remote forcing of Massachusetts Bay

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open‐ocean boundary conditions from interior data: Local and remote forcing of Massachusetts Bay
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, March 1996
DOI 10.1029/95jc03705
Authors

Philip S. Bogden, Paola Malanotte‐Rizzoli, Rich Signell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 64%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,217
of 25,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#26
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.