The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genesis and spread of multiple reassortants during the 2016/2017 H5 avian influenza epidemic in Eurasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2001813117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha J. Lycett, Anne Pohlmann, Christoph Staubach, Valentina Caliendo, Mark Woolhouse, Martin Beer, Thijs Kuiken, Global Consortium for H5N8 and Related Influenza Viruses, Samantha J. Lycett, Anne Pohlmann, Christoph Staubach, Valentina Caliendo, Steven van Borm, Andrew Breed, Francois-Xavier Briand, Ian Brown, Ádám Dán, Thomas DeLiberto, Sophie von Dobschuetz, Ron Fouchier, Marius Gilbert, Sarah Hill, Charlotte Kristiane Hjulsager, Ip, Marion Koopmans, Lars Erik Larsen, Dong-Hun Lee, Mahmoud Mohamed Naguib, Isabella Monne, Oliver Pybus, Andrew Ramey, Vladimir Savic, Kirill Sharshov, Alexander Shestopalov, Chang-Seon Song, Mieke Steensels, David Swayne, Edyta Świętoń, XiuFeng Wan, Siamak Zohari, Mark Woolhouse, Martin Beer, Thijs Kuiken |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Oman | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 76% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#615,748
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,377
of 105,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,829
of 430,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#294
of 1,093 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,093 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.