The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impaired social brain network for processing dynamic facial expressions in autism spectrum disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-13-99 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wataru Sato, Motomi Toichi, Shota Uono, Takanori Kochiyama |
| Abstract |
Impairment of social interaction via facial expressions represents a core clinical feature of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, the neural correlates of this dysfunction remain unidentified. Because this dysfunction is manifested in real-life situations, we hypothesized that the observation of dynamic, compared with static, facial expressions would reveal abnormal brain functioning in individuals with ASD.We presented dynamic and static facial expressions of fear and happiness to individuals with high-functioning ASD and to age- and sex-matched typically developing controls and recorded their brain activities using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,883,635
of 26,406,115 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#281
of 1,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,985
of 187,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,406,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.