↓ Skip to main content

Paleontological and developmental evidence resolve the homology and dual embryonic origin of a mammalian skull bone, the interparietal

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paleontological and developmental evidence resolve the homology and dual embryonic origin of a mammalian skull bone, the interparietal
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1208693109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Koyabu, Wolfgang Maier, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 56%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,398,215
of 26,380,671 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,320
of 104,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,869
of 187,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#159
of 923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,380,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.