↓ Skip to main content

「生活者としての外国人」に対する日本語教育の目的の再提案 ―「標準的なカリキュラム案」の批判的な考察―

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「生活者としての外国人」に対する日本語教育の目的の再提案 ―「標準的なカリキュラム案」の批判的な考察―
Published in
Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, August 2020
DOI 10.20721/nihongokyoiku.170.0_122
Authors

深江 新太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,921,538
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#116
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,959
of 426,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.