The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Precipitation and Reference Evapotranspiration Trends in West Africa to Support Drought Insurance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/rs12152432 |
| Authors |
S. Lucille Blakeley, Stuart Sweeney, Gregory Husak, Laura Harrison, Chris Funk, Pete Peterson, Daniel E. Osgood |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Kenya | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Engineering | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,929,122
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#2,177
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,843
of 400,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#120
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.