↓ Skip to main content

静脈・経腸栄養剤投与にともなうL‐カルニチン欠乏症と治療

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
静脈・経腸栄養剤投与にともなうL‐カルニチン欠乏症と治療
Published in
The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, May 2020
DOI 10.11638/jssmn.54.2_71
Authors

荻野 晃

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#51
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,623
of 423,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.