The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of the CHIRTS-daily quasi-global high-resolution daily temperature data set
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Data, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41597-020-00643-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Verdin, Chris Funk, Pete Peterson, Martin Landsfeld, Cascade Tuholske, Kathryn Grace |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 24% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
Scientists | 10 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 20% |
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 11% |
Engineering | 5 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#604,694
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#216
of 3,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,144
of 432,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.