The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Relative reproductive phenology and synchrony affect neonate survival in a nonprecocial ungulate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Functional Ecology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2435.13680 |
Authors |
Eric S. Michel, Bronson K. Strickland, Stephen Demarais, Jerrold L. Belant, Todd M. Kautz, Jared F. Duquette, Dean E. Beyer, Michael J. Chamberlain, Karl V. Miller, Rebecca M. Shuman, John C. Kilgo, Duane R. Diefenbach, Bret D. Wallingford, Justin K. Vreeland, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Christopher S. DePerno, Christopher E. Moorman, M. Colter Chitwood, Marcus A. Lashley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 35% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Iceland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 14 | 54% |
Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 26% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,669,503
of 23,708,357 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#344
of 2,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,051
of 413,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,708,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.