↓ Skip to main content

淺間丸龍田丸機關部計畫及び成績に就て

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zosen Kiokai, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
淺間丸龍田丸機關部計畫及び成績に就て
Published in
Journal of Zosen Kiokai, May 2007
DOI 10.2534/jjasnaoe1903.1930.55
Authors

稻垣 長止郎, 鈴木 彌太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,511,807
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zosen Kiokai
#2
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,702
of 83,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zosen Kiokai
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them