The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the efficacy of protected and multiple-use lands for bird conservation in the U.S.
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0239184 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. Lynnette Dornak, Jocelyn L. Aycrigg, John Sauer, Courtney J. Conway |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,173,474
of 26,420,475 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#113,523
of 229,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,800
of 437,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,349
of 2,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,420,475 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.