↓ Skip to main content

書評:金富子・金栄著『植民地遊廓――日本の軍隊と朝鮮半島――』

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Economies, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
書評:金富子・金栄著『植民地遊廓――日本の軍隊と朝鮮半島――』
Published in
Asian Economies, April 2020
DOI 10.24765/ajiakeizai.61.1_72
Authors

小野沢 あかね

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,680,636
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Asian Economies
#4
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,669
of 401,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Economies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them