↓ Skip to main content

補聴器と集音器 (助聴器) の特性および評価に関する検討

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
補聴器と集音器 (助聴器) の特性および評価に関する検討
Published in
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, August 2020
DOI 10.3950/jibiinkoka.123.580
Authors

亀井 昌代, 桑島 秀, 片桐 克則, 平海 晴一, 佐藤 宏昭, 小田島 葉子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,780,424
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#121
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,445
of 428,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.