The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hierarchical computing for hierarchical models in ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13513 |
| Authors |
Hanna M. McCaslin, Abigail B. Feuka, Mevin B. Hooten |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 35% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,864,424
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,318
of 2,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,192
of 442,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#43
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.