The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
「和賀川の清流を守る会」会報のテキスト分析:休廃止鉱山での水質モニタリングと会報における関連話題の長期的な変遷
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.2965/jswe.43.183 |
Authors |
柴田 由紀枝, 岩崎 雄一, 竹村 紫苑, 保高 徹生, 髙橋 徹, 松田 裕之 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
#52
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,135
of 436,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them