↓ Skip to main content

JCS 2017 Guideline on Management of Vasculitis Syndrome ― Digest Version ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
JCS 2017 Guideline on Management of Vasculitis Syndrome ― Digest Version ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsuaki Isobe, Koichi Amano, Yoshihiro Arimura, Akihiro Ishizu, Shuichi Ito, Shinya Kaname, Shigeto Kobayashi, Yoshinori Komagata, Issei Komuro, Kimihiro Komori, Kei Takahashi, Kazuo Tanemoto, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Masayoshi Harigai, Shouichi Fujimoto, Tatsuhiko Miyazaki, Tetsuro Miyata, Hidehiro Yamada, Akitoshi Yoshida, Takashi Wada, Yoshinori Inoue, Haruhito A. Uchida, Hideki Ota, Takahiro Okazaki, Mitsuho Onimaru, Tamihiro Kawakami, Reiko Kinouchi, Atsushi Kurata, Hisanori Kosuge, Ken-ei Sada, Kunihiro Shigematsu, Eiichi Suematsu, Eijun Sueyoshi, Takahiko Sugihara, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Mitsuhiro Takeno, Naoto Tamura, Michi Tsutsumino, Hiroaki Dobashi, Yoshikazu Nakaoka, Kenji Nagasaka, Yasuhiro Maejima, Hajime Yoshifuji, Yoshiko Watanabe, Shoichi Ozaki, Takeshi Kimura, Hiroshi Shigematsu, Keiko Yamauchi-Takihara, Toyoaki Murohara, Shin-ichi Momomura, on behalf of the JCS Joint Working Group

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,740
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,460
of 474,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.