↓ Skip to main content

ワクチン政策のパラドックス(理論,数理医薬,<特集>平成20年研究部会連合発表会)

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
video
1 YouTube creator
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ワクチン政策のパラドックス(理論,数理医薬,<特集>平成20年研究部会連合発表会)
Published in
Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, April 2017
DOI 10.11540/jsiamt.18.3_473
Authors

鈴木 崇文, 岩見 真吾, 竹内 康博

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,728,069
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
#4
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,533
of 325,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.