↓ Skip to main content

標本種子の発芽可能性の評価と標本作製および管理方法の種子寿命への影響(これからの標本室~ハーバリウムの管理・運営や情報発信,利用に関する新しい流れ~,日本植物分類学会第14回大会(福島)公開シンポジウム講演記録)

Overview of attention for article published in BUNRUI, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
標本種子の発芽可能性の評価と標本作製および管理方法の種子寿命への影響(これからの標本室~ハーバリウムの管理・運営や情報発信,利用に関する新しい流れ~,日本植物分類学会第14回大会(福島)公開シンポジウム講演記録)
Published in
BUNRUI, March 2017
DOI 10.18942/bunrui.kj00010238510
Authors

平澤 優輝, 港 翼, 長谷川 匡弘, 志賀 隆

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,489,054
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from BUNRUI
#30
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,759
of 326,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BUNRUI
#27
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.