The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pantropical variability in tree crown allometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Ecology & Biogeography, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/geb.13231 |
| Authors |
Grace Jopaul Loubota Panzou, Adeline Fayolle, Tommaso Jucker, Oliver L. Phillips, Stephanie Bohlman, Lindsay F. Banin, Simon L. Lewis, Kofi Affum‐Baffoe, Luciana F. Alves, Cécile Antin, Eric Arets, Luzmila Arroyo, Timothy R. Baker, Nicolas Barbier, Hans Beeckman, Uta Berger, Yannick Enock Bocko, Frans Bongers, Sam Bowers, Thom Brade, Eduardo S. Brondizio, Arthur Chantrain, Jerome Chave, Halidou Compaore, David Coomes, Adama Diallo, Arildo S. Dias, Kangbéni Dimobe, Gloria Djaney Djagbletey, Tomas Domingues, Jean‐Louis Doucet, Thomas Drouet, Eric Forni, John L. Godlee, Rosa C. Goodman, Sylvie Gourlet‐Fleury, Fidele Hien, Yoshiko Iida, Bhely Angoboy Ilondea, Jonathan Ilunga Muledi, Pierre Jacques, Shem Kuyah, Jorge López‐Portillo, Jean Joël Loumeto, Ben Hur Marimon‐Junior, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Sylvanus Mensah, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Glenn R. Moncrieff, Ayyappan Narayanan, Sean T. O’Brien, Korotimi Ouedraogo, Michael W. Palace, Raphael Pelissier, Pierre Ploton, Lourens Poorter, Casey M. Ryan, Gustavo Saiz, Karin dos Santos, Michael Schlund, Giacomo Sellan, Bonaventure Sonke, Frank Sterck, Quentin Thibaut, Yorick Van Hoef, Elmar Veenendaal, Alejandra G. Vovides, Yaozhan Xu, Tze Leong Yao, Ted R. Feldpausch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| French Guiana | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 79% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,725,725
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#382
of 2,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,480
of 533,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#12
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.